In media
The father took the blame for his son who seriously injured a pedestrian in Leskovac
JuGmedia news: 29. 03. 2024.
Members of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Leskovac arrested A. Č. (1970), from Leskovac due to the existence of grounds for suspicion that he had committed a serious crime against the safety of public traffic, as well as S. Č. (1944) due to the existence of grounds for suspicion that he committed the criminal offense of false reporting.
A. Ch. is suspected of hitting an eighty-three-year-old pedestrian on March 20, while driving a BMW vehicle in reverse, without a driver’s license and at a time when he was banned from driving a motor vehicle, who suffered serious injuries.
S. Ch. is suspected that after his son A. Č. caused a traffic accident, transported the injured pedestrian by car to the General Hospital in Leskovac, and then declared to the police that he was driving the vehicle and caused the traffic accident.
The suspects, along with criminal charges, were brought to the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office in Leskovac.
On the occasion of the traffic accident that occurred on March 20 in Leskovac, in which one person received a serious injury, the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office in Leskovac heard A.Č. (1970), due to the criminal offense of serious crime against public traffic safety and S.Č. (1944), due to the criminal offense of false reporting, the OJT announced.
After the hearing, the public prosecutor suggested that both suspects be detained for up to 30 days, due to the existence of special circumstances that by remaining at large they would hinder the proceedings by influencing unheard witnesses and accomplices, and in relation to A.Č. and due to the existence of special circumstances that he will repeat the criminal offense in a short period of time, because he is a person who has been convicted several times, among other things, for the same criminal offense.
The measures proposed by the court were not determined, but the suspects were ordered to prohibit approaching, meeting and communicating with certain persons, with the obligation to periodically report to the competent state authority. The public prosecutor filed an appeal against this decision of the court, and in the further course of the proceedings, the necessary evidentiary actions will be undertaken as soon as possible, the examination of witnesses and expert testimony by experts of the appropriate profession.